Claim C9 · descriptive · entrylib:2026.000003@v2 · 2026-11-11

Corrected · 11 November 2026 at 11:22 UTC

The proofs of C1, C2, C5, C6, C8, C10, C12, C14, C16 and C19 were checked by an independent agent on a second model (contributor P6; reports in artefacts A10 and A11). Its first round found five proofs that showed less than their claims stated; these claims are corrected to what is proved: C2 completes its argument with the normal-variance case, C5 states its condition as a nonzero $\mathbf w'\mathbf F^{i-1}\mathbf g$ and its conclusion for the objective and the variance, C10 states the conditions of the interval and that its bound is a quantile of the size distribution, C14 states the derivation of the sign (the sign printed by Svetunkov and Boylan, 2023, is in its relation), and C19 is stated for ETS(M,N,N) at horizons of two or more. The second round confirmed all ten in full. C14 rests on a formal proof (new evidence E15, definition D32) instead of an argument; D4 defines the term of each zero without presupposing its sign. Smaller precisions: C1 (positive sizes), C6 (the error mean enters the propagation through g), C8 depends on C15, C16 (alpha nonzero). Relations name references (B5-B7 added), and C1, C3, C6, C7, C9, C10 and C11 relate to the earlier work they extend or supersede. No claim ID changed.

By Ivan Svetunkov (ORCID 0000-0001-7826-0281)

The observed-data likelihood of ADAM and iETS with unobserved periods · C9

Principal claim C9 of this claimset (Svetunkov, I. (guarantor), 2026), with what it rests on. Read the whole claimset.

Copies a message for ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini: paste it there.

The message

Read https://entrylib.org/p/2026.000003/C9, one claim of a research paper with the evidence it rests on. Tell me briefly what it says and how well it is supported. If you cannot open the link, tell me instead of guessing. Then wait for my questions.

The claim

100C9 · descriptive · novelty: new, by the authors · no close match on EntryLib

For iETS(M,N,N) in the conventional multiplicative ETS form, the normal-drift mixture density of the demand size after an interval had a largest Kullback-Leibler divergence per observation from the exact density at least three orders of magnitude smaller than that of the one-step density, for the Gamma, the log-normal and the inverse Gaussian distribution.

Evidence

E20 · simulation · primary · cited by C9

Comparison, for iETS(M,N,N) under the ADAM and conventional multiplicative ETS forms, of the normal-drift mixture density (drift moments by 32-node Gauss-Legendre, mixture by 16-node Gauss-Hermite) and of the one-step density against the exact density of the size after an interval, computed on a grid of step 0.001 in log z by FFT convolution with tails cut at 1e-12, by the largest Kullback-Leibler divergence per observation over ss from 0.05 to 1 in steps of 0.05, α\alpha from 0.1 to 0.6 in steps of 0.05 and jj from 2 to 20; a 164-cell refinement run halved the step and cut tails at 1e-14. The run recorded smooth commit f9d062ee with the claimset scripts not yet committed; the scripts are archived at commit f1de3ea1.

E20.T1 · Largest Kullback-Leibler divergence per observation from the exact density of the size after an interval, of the normal-drift mixture density and of the one-step density, for iETS(M,N,N) with Gamma, log-normal and inverse Gaussian sizes in the conventional and the ADAM form (model: iETS(M,N,N))
Rowdistributionets_formlargest KL divergence per observation, normal-drift mixture vs exact densitylargest KL divergence per observation, one-step vs exact density
r1dgammaconventional0.00112.3593
r2dlnormconventional0.00455.9473
r3dinvgaussconventional0.00447.5452
r4dgammaadam0.01454.5836
r5dlnormadam0.000018.6354
r6dinvgaussadam0.0004630.772

Assumptions

C37 · methodological · tested

The drift of the states of a pure multiplicative model over an interval is approximately normally distributed, with the states known at the previous observed period. Rested on by C9.

Definitions

Methods 4

D6 ADAM multiplicative ETS: Pure multiplicative exponential smoothing in the form of the Augmented Dynamic Adaptive Model, in which each component kk is updated by the factor (1+ϵt)gk(1+\epsilon_t)^{g_k}; for ETS(M,Md,M) with seasonal period mm, zt=lt−1bt−1ϕst−m(1+ϵt)lt=lt−1bt−1ϕ(1+ϵt)αbt=bt−1ϕ(1+ϵt)βst=st−m(1+ϵt)γ.\begin{aligned} z_t &= l_{t-1}b_{t-1}^{\phi}s_{t-m}(1+\epsilon_t) \\ l_t &= l_{t-1}b_{t-1}^{\phi}(1+\epsilon_t)^{\alpha} \\ b_t &= b_{t-1}^{\phi}(1+\epsilon_t)^{\beta} \\ s_t &= s_{t-m}(1+\epsilon_t)^{\gamma}. \end{aligned}

D7 conventional multiplicative ETS: Pure multiplicative exponential smoothing in the form of Hyndman et al. (2008), in which each component kk is updated by the factor 1+gkϵt1+g_k\epsilon_t; for ETS(M,Md,M) with seasonal period mm, zt=lt−1bt−1ϕst−m(1+ϵt)lt=lt−1bt−1ϕ(1+αϵt)bt=bt−1ϕ(1+βϵt)st=st−m(1+γϵt).\begin{aligned} z_t &= l_{t-1}b_{t-1}^{\phi}s_{t-m}(1+\epsilon_t) \\ l_t &= l_{t-1}b_{t-1}^{\phi}(1+\alpha\epsilon_t) \\ b_t &= b_{t-1}^{\phi}(1+\beta\epsilon_t) \\ s_t &= s_{t-m}(1+\gamma\epsilon_t). \end{aligned}

D10 normal-drift mixture density: Approximate predictive density of a demand size after jt−1j_t-1 unobserved periods: the one-step density fz(zt∣μ^ted)f_z(z_t\mid\hat\mu_t e^{d}) mixed over a normal drift of the states d∼𝒩(mt,wt)d\sim\mathcal N(m_t,w_t), with mtm_t, wtw_t computed by 32-node Gauss-Legendre quadrature on the quantile function of 1+ϵ1+\epsilon and the mixture by Gauss-Hermite quadrature.

D11 one-step density: The density of a demand size after an interval taken as the one-step density fz(zt∣μ^t)f_z(z_t\mid\hat\mu_t) of the model, without the drift of the states over the unobserved periods.

Data 1

D12 iETS(M,N,N): Intermittent demand sizes zt=lt−1(1+ϵt)z_t=l_{t-1}(1+\epsilon_t) with E⁡(1+ϵt)=1\E(1+\epsilon_t)=1 and Var⁡(1+ϵt)=s\Var(1+\epsilon_t)=s, Gamma, log-normal or inverse Gaussian 1+ϵt1+\epsilon_t (the greybox parameterisation of the package) and the level moving at every period, observed or not: lt=lt−1(1+ϵt)αl_t=l_{t-1}(1+\epsilon_t)^\alpha in the ADAM multiplicative ETS and lt=lt−1(1+αϵt)l_t=l_{t-1}(1+\alpha\epsilon_t) in the conventional multiplicative ETS.

Variables and measures 1

D14 Kullback-Leibler divergence: The divergence ∫glog⁡(g/h)\int g\log(g/h) of an approximate density hh from the exact density gg, per observation; over a grid, its largest value.

Study design 1

D13 exact density by convolution: The exact density of the size after an interval, computed on a grid of step 0.001 in log⁡z\log z by FFT convolution with tails cut at 1e-12, compared with an approximation by the largest Kullback-Leibler divergence per observation over ss from 0.05 to 1 in steps of 0.05, α\alpha from 0.1 to 0.6 in steps of 0.05 and jj from 2 to 20 (kl_mixture.py); a refinement of 164 cells halved the step and cut the tails at 1e-14.

Concepts 1

D9 drift of the states: The change dt=log⁡(μt/μ^t)d_t=\log(\mu_t/\hat\mu_t) of the logarithm of the location of a pure multiplicative model accumulated over the unobserved periods since the last observed period, relative to the point forecast μ^t\hat\mu_t with zero errors.

Context

Extends B4 · own earlier work · from C9
Svetunkov and Boylan define iETS, intermittent demand as the product of a Bernoulli occurrence and a demand size modelled by exponential smoothing, and estimate it with a likelihood that adds the differential entropy of the size for each period with zero demand.

Artefacts

Score

Scores are computed by rules from the claimset file (EntryLib rubric 0.2): they check the record, not the science, and may change as the rubric and reviews develop. The rubric.

C9: 100, High

Novelty: new, by the authors · no close match on EntryLib

Nothing lost.