EntryLib: the issues that lower the reliability scores of entrylib:2026.000004@v1, by the EntryLib rubric 0.2.
For the authors and their agent: each issue lowers the scores of the claims it names, by the points given. Address what you can in a correction (a new version of the claimset) and submit it; the scores are computed again when it is published. Before submitting it, `claimset score` (or the MCP tool score) shows the scores it would have.
Scores are computed by rules from the claimset file (EntryLib rubric 0.2): they check the record, not the science, and may change as the rubric and reviews develop.
Rubric: https://github.com/entrylib/rubric/blob/main/RUBRIC.md
Page: https://entrylib.org/p/2026.000004@v1#score · Scores as JSON: https://entrylib.org/p/2026.000004@v1.score.json

PAPER: reliability 77 (medium), the score of its lowest principal claim, C1. Raising the lowest principal claim raises the paper.

ISSUES, those of the principal claims first, most costly first:

P1. Limitation L1 (could bias magnitude, not mitigated): Themes are assigned by keyword rules on issue titles and bodies; some matches are incidental words, and issues about a theme that use other words are missed.
  Check: limitation (group: open); costs up to 12 points.
  Lowers: C1 (-12), C2 (-12).
  Concerns: L1.
  To fix: Mitigate it with evidence, or narrow the claim's scope so that it no longer applies.

P2. The lab record flags the test: holdout used elsewhere.
  Check: plan_flags (group: plan); costs up to 5 points.
  Lowers: C1 (-5), C2 (-5).
  To fix: Rerun the test as planned, or explain the flag in a limitation.

P3. The plan's time is anchored by a git push only.
  Check: plan_anchor (group: plan); costs up to 3 points.
  Lowers: C1 (-3), C2 (-3).
  To fix: Anchor plans with the platform, a timestamp authority (RFC 3161) or a registry.

P4. Limitation L3 (reduces precision, not mitigated): Reactions are sparse: the median exploration-set issue has none, so theme totals are driven by a few issues.
  Check: limitation (group: open); costs up to 2 points.
  Lowers: C1 (-2), C2 (-2).
  Concerns: L3.
  To fix: Mitigate it with evidence, or narrow the claim's scope so that it no longer applies.

P5. Limitation L2 (reduces transferability, not mitigated): GitHub feature requests come from people who file issues on GitHub, mostly experienced users and contributors; they do not represent all MuseScore users. A study of Moodle found that developers write most issue-tracker feature requests while users write most forum requests (KC and Hosseini 2026, arXiv:2606.20876).
  Check: limitation (group: open); costs up to 1 points.
  Lowers: C1 (-1), C2 (-1).
  Concerns: L2.
  To fix: Mitigate it with evidence, or narrow the claim's scope so that it no longer applies.

CLAIMS: score (band): issues
C1: 77 (medium): P1 (-12), P2 (-5), P3 (-3), P4 (-2), P5 (-1)
C2: 77 (medium): P1 (-12), P2 (-5), P3 (-3), P4 (-2), P5 (-1)