{
 "bundle_of": "C1",
 "schema_version": "0.41",
 "paper": {
  "id": "entrylib:2026.000003",
  "version": 2,
  "title": "The observed-data likelihood of ADAM and iETS with unobserved periods",
  "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
  "status": "corrected",
  "date": "2026-11-11",
  "status_notice": {
   "date": "2026-11-11",
   "reason_code": "correction",
   "statement": "The proofs of C1, C2, C5, C6, C8, C10, C12, C14, C16 and C19 were checked by an independent agent on a second model (contributor P6; reports in artefacts A10 and A11). Its first round found five proofs that showed less than their claims stated; these claims are corrected to what is proved: C2 completes its argument with the normal-variance case, C5 states its condition as a nonzero $\\mathbf w'\\mathbf F^{i-1}\\mathbf g$ and its conclusion for the objective and the variance, C10 states the conditions of the interval and that its bound is a quantile of the size distribution, C14 states the derivation of the sign (the sign printed by Svetunkov and Boylan, 2023, is in its relation), and C19 is stated for ETS(M,N,N) at horizons of two or more. The second round confirmed all ten in full. C14 rests on a formal proof (new evidence E15, definition D32) instead of an argument; D4 defines the term of each zero without presupposing its sign. Smaller precisions: C1 (positive sizes), C6 (the error mean enters the propagation through g), C8 depends on C15, C16 (alpha nonzero). Relations name references (B5-B7 added), and C1, C3, C6, C7, C9, C10 and C11 relate to the earlier work they extend or supersede. No claim ID changed.",
   "issued_by": "Ivan Svetunkov (ORCID 0000-0001-7826-0281)"
  }
 },
 "claims": [
  {
   "id": "C1",
   "statement": "For a model of intermittent demand $y_t=o_tz_t$ with Bernoulli occurrence $o_t\\sim\\text{Bernoulli}(p_t)$ independent of a positive continuous size $z_t$, the [[D3:observed-data likelihood]] is $$\\sum_{O_t=1}\\log f(z_t\\mid Y_{t-1};\\theta) + \\sum_{O_t=1}\\log p_t + \\sum_{O_t=0}\\log(1-p_t),$$ in which the unobserved sizes do not appear and the size and occurrence parts separate.",
   "about": {
    "subject": "D3",
    "relation": "separates into a size part and an occurrence part for",
    "object": "models of intermittent demand",
    "comparator": null,
    "conditions": [
     "Bernoulli occurrence independent of a continuous size"
    ]
   },
   "type": "formal",
   "role": "principal",
   "novelty": "no_prior_found",
   "scope": {
    "population": "models of intermittent demand $y_t=o_tz_t$ (iETS, ADAM with an occurrence part)",
    "data_type": "intermittent demand time series",
    "conditions": [
     "Bernoulli occurrence independent of a continuous demand size"
    ]
   },
   "support": [
    {
     "kind": "formal_proof",
     "evidence": "E1"
    }
   ],
   "assumptions": [
    "C30",
    "C31",
    "C32"
   ],
   "verification": "agent_checked",
   "provenance": "author_stated",
   "relations": [
    {
     "type": "extends",
     "reference": "B1",
     "self": false,
     "note": "Dempster, Laird and Rubin define the EM algorithm, which maximises the likelihood of incomplete data through the expected complete-data log-likelihood."
    },
    {
     "type": "extends",
     "reference": "B4",
     "locator": "Appendix B, eq. B.6",
     "self": true,
     "note": "Svetunkov and Boylan define iETS, intermittent demand as the product of a Bernoulli occurrence and a demand size modelled by exponential smoothing, and estimate it with a likelihood that adds the differential entropy of the size for each period with zero demand."
    }
   ],
   "checks": [
    {
     "by": "P6",
     "outcome": "confirmed",
     "extent": "full",
     "notes": "Re-derived the prediction-error factorisation: P(y=0|past)=1-p by independence and continuity, and y>0 has density p*f, so the log-likelihood separates into size and occurrence parts. Checked numerically on ETS(A,N,N) with two unobserved periods: the integral of the complete-data density over the unobserved sizes equals the Kalman predictive-density sum to 2e-13. (first round; report A10, scripts A14-A16.)"
    }
   ],
   "verifiability": "open",
   "verifiability_flags": []
  },
  {
   "id": "C30",
   "statement": "The errors $\\epsilon_t$ of the single source of error model are independent across periods.",
   "type": "descriptive",
   "role": "supporting",
   "support": [
    {
     "kind": "assumption"
    }
   ],
   "assumption_category": "statistical",
   "check": "unchecked",
   "provenance": "author_stated",
   "verifiability": "not_applicable",
   "verifiability_flags": []
  },
  {
   "id": "C31",
   "statement": "In the intermittent demand model the occurrence $o_t$ is independent of the potential demand size $z_t$.",
   "type": "descriptive",
   "role": "supporting",
   "support": [
    {
     "kind": "assumption"
    }
   ],
   "assumption_category": "theorem_condition",
   "check": "unchecked",
   "provenance": "author_stated",
   "verifiability": "not_applicable",
   "verifiability_flags": []
  },
  {
   "id": "C32",
   "statement": "The potential demand size $z_t$ has a continuous distribution, so that $P(z_t=0)=0$.",
   "type": "descriptive",
   "role": "supporting",
   "support": [
    {
     "kind": "assumption"
    }
   ],
   "assumption_category": "theorem_condition",
   "check": "unchecked",
   "provenance": "author_stated",
   "verifiability": "not_applicable",
   "verifiability_flags": []
  }
 ],
 "definitions": [
  {
   "id": "D3",
   "term": "observed-data likelihood",
   "definition": "The joint density of the observed data only, obtained by integrating the complete-data likelihood over the values $\\mathbf z_{\\mathrm{mis}}$ at the unobserved periods: $$L(\\theta)=\\int f(\\mathbf y_{\\mathrm{obs}},\\mathbf z_{\\mathrm{mis}};\\theta)\\,d\\mathbf z_{\\mathrm{mis}}.$$",
   "kind": "concept"
  }
 ],
 "evidence": [
  {
   "id": "E1",
   "profile": "formal",
   "description": "Analytical derivation in the source draft (artefact A1).",
   "foundation": "Kolmogorov probability axioms",
   "steps": [
    {
     "id": "E1.1",
     "statement": "$P(y_t=0\\mid Y_{t-1})=(1-p_t)\\int f(z\\mid Y_{t-1})dz=1-p_t$",
     "by": [
      "C31",
      "C32"
     ],
     "rule": "independence and continuity"
    },
    {
     "id": "E1.2",
     "statement": "$y_t>0$ has density $p_tf(y_t\\mid Y_{t-1})$",
     "by": [
      "C31"
     ],
     "rule": "independence"
    },
    {
     "id": "E1.3",
     "statement": "The joint density of the observed data is the product of these conditional terms",
     "by": [
      "E1.1",
      "E1.2"
     ],
     "rule": "prediction-error decomposition"
    }
   ],
   "artefacts": [
    "A1"
   ],
   "availability": {
    "level": "public"
   },
   "assumptions": [
    "C31",
    "C32"
   ]
  }
 ],
 "artefacts": [
  {
   "id": "A1",
   "kind": "manuscript",
   "uri": "https://github.com/openforecast-org/smooth/blob/8a5fbbb334b0d6192a3c3e8a5773f512e548e891/python/docs/INTERMITTENT_LIKELIHOOD.tex",
   "version": "sha256:44eb855578262cd1668929bc6659cfcaaa4cd3b3e153541deffd91720908d1e3",
   "availability": {
    "level": "public"
   },
   "description": "LaTeX source of the draft 'Estimating exponential smoothing with unobserved periods: the observed-data likelihood of ADAM and iETS' (October 2026).",
   "licence": "LGPL-2.1-only"
  },
  {
   "id": "A10",
   "kind": "proof",
   "uri": "https://entrylib.org/p/2026.000003/v2/files/files/proof-checks/proof-checks.md",
   "version": "sha256:2ccd9457ef876f55c27b3b0004c25c5a991507f6667c59795e7515cc552fd7f1",
   "availability": {
    "level": "public"
   },
   "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
   "description": "Report of the first round of the independent proof check by the contributor P6 (2026-11-11): for C1, C2, C5, C6, C8, C10, C12, C14, C16 and C19, the re-derivation, the numerical spot checks, the outcome and the gaps found."
  },
  {
   "id": "A11",
   "kind": "proof",
   "uri": "https://entrylib.org/p/2026.000003/v2/files/files/proof-checks/proof-checks-2.md",
   "version": "sha256:1ba26c97d75792bd6d91d375288b585b375e459560b131ad4102b5762e7dbbf7",
   "availability": {
    "level": "public"
   },
   "licence": "CC-BY-4.0",
   "description": "Report of the second round of the independent proof check by P6 (2026-11-11), on C2, C5, C10, C14 and C19 as corrected after the first round, and on the smaller changes to C1, C6, C8 and C16."
  },
  {
   "id": "A14",
   "kind": "code",
   "uri": "https://entrylib.org/p/2026.000003/v2/files/files/proof-checks/chk1.py",
   "version": "sha256:88de8878db174afda5c9a385d6d46bd0b00e744ce5fa8402814f47aa9d65db8f",
   "availability": {
    "level": "public"
   },
   "licence": "LGPL-2.1-only",
   "description": "Numerical spot checks of the first round of the proof check (Python with numpy); the report A10 says which claim each serves."
  },
  {
   "id": "A16",
   "kind": "code",
   "uri": "https://entrylib.org/p/2026.000003/v2/files/files/proof-checks/chk3.py",
   "version": "sha256:c87a752acc6bbb6816fce17692a752be300da8ab53fa3ddb769164084a8b3833",
   "availability": {
    "level": "public"
   },
   "licence": "LGPL-2.1-only",
   "description": "Numerical spot checks of the proof check (Python with numpy), used in both rounds; the reports A10 and A11 say which claim each serves."
  }
 ]
}